Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the different possibilities for teens in light to the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that we should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The author also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I agree with her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
Almost all of the data on smoking and its own risks comes from adults, which helps it be hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are due to smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, since many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that people who smoke don’t plan to achieve this.
The author suggests that we should consider the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, even though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who utilize the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from this is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it is critical to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both very similar behaviors. What makes vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to have the same effect as smoking, without the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers could be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they’re taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points about the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies must not be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they have done is increase the quantity of chemicals and additives which are present in traditional cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that we have already seen the unwanted effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We already have countless reports concerning the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have plenty of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems caused by long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a key point in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last couple of years.
The author does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative Vape Pens health effects of his product either. He also discounts the theory that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we have to do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the level of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who try to quit often do so due to other medical issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are numerous reasons why people smoke. The writer has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it holds true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, a number of the chemicals found in cigarette smoking are found in the smokes. The author seems to be of the belief that all we need to do to solve the problem of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not based in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing the volume of chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health and wellness. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain any of the harmful chemicals within regular cigarettes.